Review

Saturday Night Review (Hulu Documentary)

Saturday Night Live

My Rating: 2.5/5

Saturday Night follows the making of an episode of the sketch comedy show Saturday Night Live hosted by the legendary John Malkovich. A grueling week long process, the making of an episode of SNL requires many sleepless nights and a litany of sketch ideas that most likely than not get cut. Though the film is worth watching just to see some of the incredibly talented and overworked comedians that make SNL what it is, it largely feels like a missed opportunity on the part of director James Franco to capture the high stakes of the show.

Saturday Night highlights the incredibly difficult task of making people laugh and the reality that failure is a likely outcome. Starting with the pitch meeting on Monday, writers and performers begin the nerve-wracking process of teaming up and writing material in time for the table read the next day where some fifty sketches get cut down to nine. The tension is high as each performer and writer nervously reads their material for the first time with no idea whether they will tank or make people laugh. The selected skits make their way to rehearsals and dress rehearsals where ultimately some still get cut as late as Saturday afternoon. John Malkovich is a great sport and his incredible talent makes for one of the more memorable hosting jobs in recent memory.

Though the subject matter of the film is inherently interesting (it brings to light a process mythologized but not often seen), the film’s style and direction ultimately fail to capture the spectrum of emotions involved in the production process and skates over the more interesting parts. The film is shot mostly handheld and switches often from color to black and white giving it the experimental feel of a student film. James Franco, an SNL hosting alum, directs the film and we are constantly aware of his presence behind the camera. The result is that the interviews are more of a conversation with a well-known celebrity and lack any sort of real depth. Often times Franco is referencing his own experiences on the show. This gave me the feeling that this documentary was more like a jog down memory lane for the actor rather than a real exploration of what it’s like to be a part of such an iconic show. Unfortunately, this rare opportunity for access inside the walls of 30 Rock felt like a wasted opportunity. Franco himself asks Lorne Michaels towards the end of the film “Maybe we’re not getting the full experience?” and I would have to say no, we’re not.

Advertisements
Standard
Opinion

The Jinx Finale: “What the Hell Did I do?” (Spoiler Alert)

SUB-NY-16ARREST-JP1-articleLarge

The Jinx finale had been building up to be a big one but not even the series producers’ could have expected a lead-in as a big as the arrest Robert Durst on the eve of their final episode. In a twist that seemed perfectly timed, the HBO program managed to do what decades of police investigation could not — find a solid link between Robert Durst and Susan Berman’s murder. Though much of this final episode seemed to be filler content before the explosive last ten minutes of the program, we did see first hand a part of Robert Durst that was manipulative and deceitful. Whether Durst started to have second thoughts about the outcome of this show or just plain got bored with the project, we saw him lie to the series producers about his whereabouts and delay scheduling a second interview time after time. At one point Durst says he is in Madrid when it is later discovered that he’s been in Los Angeles.

After months of dragging his feet, Robert Durst is arrested in New York for violating a protection order put in place by his family members. Andrew Jarecki suddenly finds himself with the upper hand. Durst’s lawyers want some of the footage Jarecki took in order to build their defense case. However, this footage comes at the price of Durst sitting down for the anticipated second interview during which, Jarecki plans to confront Robert with the much talked about letters that appear to match Durst’s handwriting to the handwriting of the anonymous letter to police alerting them of Susan Berman’s dead body or should I say cadaver.

The final interviews happened and it was rather anti-climactic. Durst didn’t seem outwardly alarmed (aside for some unfortunately timed burping) and responded how we all thought he would respond. He admitted to writing the letter to Susan but certainly not the cadaver letter and of course, block lettering can be similar regardless of the writer. The really outrageous part of the finale came at the very end when for a second time, Durst forgot he was mic’ed and started talking to himself while in the bathroom. He actually says the words “There it is. You’re caught” and “What the hell did I do? Killed them all of course”. I actually gasped when I first heard the latter.

Given that Robert Durst was arrested for Susan’s murder, I was anticipating a real smoking gun or even (I admit this is a little far fetched) a confession. But after analyzing it, I think that what he said is incredibly incriminating (and my heart tells he did it), it’s definitely not irrefutable evidence. I can easily see how with a million dollar defense team, that could be explained away as someone talking to themselves in a nonsensical way not to mention that as The New York Times suggested, this tape could be inadmissible in court due to the fact he was in a bathroom and could have reasonably believed he was alone. The same goes for the letter. They can potentially prove that he knew about the dead body but is there actual evidence that he committed the murder? Just as investigators could prove he dismembered Morris Black but could not prove that he actually committed an act of murder. Unless investigators have some additional evidence that ties him to the murder, there is definitely some work to do for the prosecution.

16DURST2-master315-v2

I also find it so hard to believe that Durst would forget about his microphone being on. As eccentric and sometimes bumbling as he comes off, I have no doubt that he is a highly intelligent and aware man. Which begs the question, was he just messing with us? Is he trying to provoke us so he gets caught? Only time will be able to tell and the media circus is going to continue until some kind of closure is found in court.

It’s been an exciting six episodes as us viewers got to know Bob Durst, an eccentric, strangely likable and at the same time chilling character. This series is a great example of how expertly executed documentary film can have a real impact on the issues it covers. In this case, it led to an arrest in a decades old murder case. Jarecki and his team’s stellar research made for an extremely compelling and revealing series. As sad as I am that this series is over, I have no doubt that we will be hearing much much more from Mr. Robert Durst.

Standard
Review

Closure Documentary Review (Netflix)

Trailer-Cover+Image2
My Rating: 3.7
This is an emotional documentary about a young woman’s search to find her birth parents after growing up in a large multiracial family in Washington State. Angela, an African American woman that was raised by Caucasian parents has always felt a need to connect with her birth parents and find out more about herself. This documentary is a personal and heartfelt story that takes the viewer through the spectrum of emotions felt by adoptive children and their families. It touches upon issues of identity related to race, family and sense of belonging without delving too deep in any of these topics.

This film begins with a pivotal moment when Angela finally strikes up the courage to call her birth mother for the first time. The phone rings and we hear a “hello” from the mother that she so desperately was trying to find. The film then launches into the back story of a young girl adopted as a baby with special needs. She was told that she would never walk. We discover that not only does she walk but she becomes a basketball player. She is a psychology major and works in the adoption agency that her parents adopted her from.

We follow Angela and her family’s journey to find her birth parents. The eventual meeting is complicated and filled with nervousness, joy and, as the title suggests, closure for Angela and her family. Undoubtedly the heart of this film is Angela. Throughout her journey of self-discovery, she remains effervescent and positive. The combination of her vulnerability and simultaneous strength is what really resonated with me. The director of the film is her husband, Bryan Tucker, who serves as a narrator of the story. This adds to the extremely personal nature of the film. If there is one criticism that I could give to this movie is that I would have wanted to hear more of Angela’s story and experiences in her own voice. We saw her go through all these life changing experiences and I wanted desperately to know what was going through her head.

Though the film could have dug deeper into the underlying effects and ramifications that the adoption process has on families and individuals, this film manages to take us on a personal journey that is certainly worth watching and reminds us that coming to terms with your history and roots is an important part of self-acceptance.
Standard
Opinion

The Jinx Bombshell (SPOILER ALERT)

09DURST2-popup

If you’ve been religiously watching The Jinx on HBO like I have, you would know that this Sunday’s episode included a new revelation about the murder of Robert Durt’s close friend Susan Berman, one that seems to pretty clearly implicate Durst in her murder or at least that he had knowledge of it. Andrew Jarecki’s documentary series has been slowly building to this moment and wow, is it a big one.

Trying to ride off the coat tails of the Serial podcast’s huge success, HBO released this similarly serialized documentary series hoping to capture some of that audience. As a Serial fan, I definitely took that bait and have been thoroughly enjoying this series albeit for different reasons. Though there is a lot less ambiguity around this case (some parts of Durst’s story are just so far fetched to believe I found myself wondering less if he did it but how he got away with it), the masterful way that it the story is told with beautifully eerie visual sequences and incredibly telling moments such as Robert Durst quietly rehearsing to himself what he was going to say during a break in the interview is what really caught my interest. Another big difference is this new evidence that the filmmaker discovered. Unlike Serial which analyzes existing evidence to draw its conclusions (some of which was ignored such as Asia McClain’s testimony), Jarecki and HBO’s The Jinx just made a connection that can make a real difference in an unsolved murder investigation and possibly lead to an indictment.

The revelation came at the end of the episode when Sareb Kaufman, Susan Berman’s stepson, contacted the filmmakers to alert them about a letter he had found sent from Robert Durst to Susan before her murder. When he handed over the letter, the producers are shocked to see that the handwriting is almost identical to the handwriting on an anonymous letter sent to the Beverly Hills police alerting them to a “cadaver” in Susan Berman’s home and leading to the discovery of her body. Looking at the writing it looks almost undoubtedly the same (at least to my untrained eye). Even the word “Beverly” is misspelled as “Beverley” in both letters. Kaufman, who had maintained a relationship with Durst since his step mom’s murder, was in tears while comparing the two letters. I have to admit that I was a taken aback that anyone would be hanging out or accepting money from someone that was suspected of being involved of their loved ones murder. This moment seemed like Kaufman’s admission to himself that he could no longer ignore the reality that he could have been dancing with the devil.

2680EE9F00000578-2988014-image-a-2_1425994807934 2680EE9600000578-2988014-image-a-3_1425994811098

Susan Berman was a close confidante of Robert Durst and it is theorized that she could have known details of the disappearance of Durst’s wife and may have been killed by Durst to prevent her from talking. According to The New York TImes, the Los Angeles Police Department has recently reopened the case and this letter could be a huge part of their new investigation. Unlike Adnan Syed’s case that seems to be drudging its way through the court appeals process, we might really see some progress in terms of the Robert Durst saga sometime soon and theoretically a season two of The Jinx. The episode ended with references to a second interview with Robert Durst where the filmmakers confront him with this new evidence. This is the first time in the season where I have been really anxious to the see the next episode and I can officially call myself hooked on the show. Sadly, this next episode is the last one.

I will admit that during parts of his interviews Robert Durst came off as likeable, quirky man who I almost felt some kind of sympathy for. But I find it hard to deny this new and pretty damning evidence. Is this an eccentric man that had the worst luck in the world or this a privileged serial killer whose status allowed him to get away with multiple terrifying murders? We’ll never know the answer with a hundred percent certainty but I think we’re getting close.

Standard
Opinion

Why India’s Daughter Needs To Be Seen

The BBC’s documentary India’s Daughter about the brutal rape and murder of Jyoti Singh, a young medical student on her way from the movies with a friend who was tricked onto a bus and gang raped has been gaining controversial steam over the past twenty-four hours after India’s government moved to ban the film from being shown on TV in their country. The BBC complied and removed the film from their programming but that hasn’t stopped many Youtubers from posting the film online. The Twittersphere has been blowing up with people either praising the decision to censor the film or vehemently arguing against it. Regardless, if India’s intentions were to censor and downplay the controversy, their approach has certainly backfired.

Having watched it myself today on one of these bootlegged Youtube accounts (I’ll post the link below), I can say that it is one of the most disturbing films I have watched in recent history. The documentary, though not particularly artful, managed to paint a horrific picture of the events of that terrible night when Jyoti Singh was fatally raped in Delhi and even more vividly portray a shocking attitude towards women on the part of the attackers who showed no remorse and took no responsibility for their actions.

One of the more controversial parts of the documentary is the decision to give voice to Mukesh Singh, one of the attackers and the driver of the bus that Jyoti was lured into. He goes on to say truly shocking and vile things such as no decent girl would be roaming around the streets at 9 pm and that the girl is more responsible for rape than the boy without even an ounce of regret or empathy on his face. I understand the concern that by interviewing this man, we are giving him a platform to further his views but I think the interview does quite the opposite. It’s repulsive, it’s shocking and clearly serves to show how monstrous these acts and these attitudes really are. We need to no longer stay blind to the kind of attitudes towards women that exist in India and around the world, we need to face it head on and we need to deal with it. It’s not a platform for hate speech but rather a wake up call for change.

At the beginning of the film, Joyti’s mother explains that her name means “light”. If there is any light that comes from this story it’s Joyti’s life and her determination to educate herself and change the mentality of the world she lived in. There is one part of the film that is unarguably worth watching, it’s the telling of her story. In the final scene of the film when Jyoti’s funeral pyre is burning and we see what is literally her light going out, I was struck with a thought; we can keep that light burning by fighting for changes in society and her death need not be in vain.

Standard