Opinion, Review

Montage of Heck Review (HBO)


My Rating: 5/5

After his death, Kurt Cobain reached icon status as the champion of the misunderstood and the photogenic front man of 90’s grunge band Nirvana. Though many documentaries have been made about the meteoric rise of Nirvana as a rock band with Kurt at the helm, Brett Morgen managed to peel away at the glorification of his life and show us Kurt Cobain through his own thoughts and videos in this chaotic, magnetic and powerful documentary.

Montage of Heck features exclusive home videos and recordings of Kurt Cobain that reveal the most intimate details of his thinking. Starting with his childhood, the film fearlessly outlines the defining moments of Kurt’s life in all their beauty and ugliness. An energetic child, Kurt is deeply affected by his parents divorce. We witness pivotal events during his upbringing that are painful and contribute to an internal feeling of shame and self-loathing that sadly followed Kurt through super stardom to his death.

If you’re looking for a straightforward bio-pic with a play by play of the defining moments of Kurt Cobain’s career, this isn’t it. Instead, it’s a vivid and highly visual portrayal of Kurt’s notebooks and thoughts. His journals were at times very funny and sarcastic. He was filled with ideas and an internal drive to prove his worth. Some of it was shocking and very dark. After watching this film, I felt like I could finally begin to understand some of the pain and shame that Kurt was going through.

Brett Morgen chose to highlight Kurt Cobain’s drug addiction. Seeing home videos of Kurt strung out and nodding off while holding baby Frances Bean was a stark reminder of how unglamorous his final days really were. He was not an icon, or a hero or an anti-hero. He was a human being that was deeply affected by his experiences growing up and filled with an incredibly amount of potential but also with a deep sadness. I saw myself in part of his struggle and I think that’s why his music affect so many so deeply. Which brings me to the take away from this whole film, it was a great tragedy that his life was lost at such a young age and there’s really nothing cool or epic about it.


The Jinx Finale: “What the Hell Did I do?” (Spoiler Alert)


The Jinx finale had been building up to be a big one but not even the series producers’ could have expected a lead-in as a big as the arrest Robert Durst on the eve of their final episode. In a twist that seemed perfectly timed, the HBO program managed to do what decades of police investigation could not — find a solid link between Robert Durst and Susan Berman’s murder. Though much of this final episode seemed to be filler content before the explosive last ten minutes of the program, we did see first hand a part of Robert Durst that was manipulative and deceitful. Whether Durst started to have second thoughts about the outcome of this show or just plain got bored with the project, we saw him lie to the series producers about his whereabouts and delay scheduling a second interview time after time. At one point Durst says he is in Madrid when it is later discovered that he’s been in Los Angeles.

After months of dragging his feet, Robert Durst is arrested in New York for violating a protection order put in place by his family members. Andrew Jarecki suddenly finds himself with the upper hand. Durst’s lawyers want some of the footage Jarecki took in order to build their defense case. However, this footage comes at the price of Durst sitting down for the anticipated second interview during which, Jarecki plans to confront Robert with the much talked about letters that appear to match Durst’s handwriting to the handwriting of the anonymous letter to police alerting them of Susan Berman’s dead body or should I say cadaver.

The final interviews happened and it was rather anti-climactic. Durst didn’t seem outwardly alarmed (aside for some unfortunately timed burping) and responded how we all thought he would respond. He admitted to writing the letter to Susan but certainly not the cadaver letter and of course, block lettering can be similar regardless of the writer. The really outrageous part of the finale came at the very end when for a second time, Durst forgot he was mic’ed and started talking to himself while in the bathroom. He actually says the words “There it is. You’re caught” and “What the hell did I do? Killed them all of course”. I actually gasped when I first heard the latter.

Given that Robert Durst was arrested for Susan’s murder, I was anticipating a real smoking gun or even (I admit this is a little far fetched) a confession. But after analyzing it, I think that what he said is incredibly incriminating (and my heart tells he did it), it’s definitely not irrefutable evidence. I can easily see how with a million dollar defense team, that could be explained away as someone talking to themselves in a nonsensical way not to mention that as The New York Times suggested, this tape could be inadmissible in court due to the fact he was in a bathroom and could have reasonably believed he was alone. The same goes for the letter. They can potentially prove that he knew about the dead body but is there actual evidence that he committed the murder? Just as investigators could prove he dismembered Morris Black but could not prove that he actually committed an act of murder. Unless investigators have some additional evidence that ties him to the murder, there is definitely some work to do for the prosecution.


I also find it so hard to believe that Durst would forget about his microphone being on. As eccentric and sometimes bumbling as he comes off, I have no doubt that he is a highly intelligent and aware man. Which begs the question, was he just messing with us? Is he trying to provoke us so he gets caught? Only time will be able to tell and the media circus is going to continue until some kind of closure is found in court.

It’s been an exciting six episodes as us viewers got to know Bob Durst, an eccentric, strangely likable and at the same time chilling character. This series is a great example of how expertly executed documentary film can have a real impact on the issues it covers. In this case, it led to an arrest in a decades old murder case. Jarecki and his team’s stellar research made for an extremely compelling and revealing series. As sad as I am that this series is over, I have no doubt that we will be hearing much much more from Mr. Robert Durst.


The Jinx Bombshell (SPOILER ALERT)


If you’ve been religiously watching The Jinx on HBO like I have, you would know that this Sunday’s episode included a new revelation about the murder of Robert Durt’s close friend Susan Berman, one that seems to pretty clearly implicate Durst in her murder or at least that he had knowledge of it. Andrew Jarecki’s documentary series has been slowly building to this moment and wow, is it a big one.

Trying to ride off the coat tails of the Serial podcast’s huge success, HBO released this similarly serialized documentary series hoping to capture some of that audience. As a Serial fan, I definitely took that bait and have been thoroughly enjoying this series albeit for different reasons. Though there is a lot less ambiguity around this case (some parts of Durst’s story are just so far fetched to believe I found myself wondering less if he did it but how he got away with it), the masterful way that it the story is told with beautifully eerie visual sequences and incredibly telling moments such as Robert Durst quietly rehearsing to himself what he was going to say during a break in the interview is what really caught my interest. Another big difference is this new evidence that the filmmaker discovered. Unlike Serial which analyzes existing evidence to draw its conclusions (some of which was ignored such as Asia McClain’s testimony), Jarecki and HBO’s The Jinx just made a connection that can make a real difference in an unsolved murder investigation and possibly lead to an indictment.

The revelation came at the end of the episode when Sareb Kaufman, Susan Berman’s stepson, contacted the filmmakers to alert them about a letter he had found sent from Robert Durst to Susan before her murder. When he handed over the letter, the producers are shocked to see that the handwriting is almost identical to the handwriting on an anonymous letter sent to the Beverly Hills police alerting them to a “cadaver” in Susan Berman’s home and leading to the discovery of her body. Looking at the writing it looks almost undoubtedly the same (at least to my untrained eye). Even the word “Beverly” is misspelled as “Beverley” in both letters. Kaufman, who had maintained a relationship with Durst since his step mom’s murder, was in tears while comparing the two letters. I have to admit that I was a taken aback that anyone would be hanging out or accepting money from someone that was suspected of being involved of their loved ones murder. This moment seemed like Kaufman’s admission to himself that he could no longer ignore the reality that he could have been dancing with the devil.

2680EE9F00000578-2988014-image-a-2_1425994807934 2680EE9600000578-2988014-image-a-3_1425994811098

Susan Berman was a close confidante of Robert Durst and it is theorized that she could have known details of the disappearance of Durst’s wife and may have been killed by Durst to prevent her from talking. According to The New York TImes, the Los Angeles Police Department has recently reopened the case and this letter could be a huge part of their new investigation. Unlike Adnan Syed’s case that seems to be drudging its way through the court appeals process, we might really see some progress in terms of the Robert Durst saga sometime soon and theoretically a season two of The Jinx. The episode ended with references to a second interview with Robert Durst where the filmmakers confront him with this new evidence. This is the first time in the season where I have been really anxious to the see the next episode and I can officially call myself hooked on the show. Sadly, this next episode is the last one.

I will admit that during parts of his interviews Robert Durst came off as likeable, quirky man who I almost felt some kind of sympathy for. But I find it hard to deny this new and pretty damning evidence. Is this an eccentric man that had the worst luck in the world or this a privileged serial killer whose status allowed him to get away with multiple terrifying murders? We’ll never know the answer with a hundred percent certainty but I think we’re getting close.


Why India’s Daughter Needs To Be Seen

The BBC’s documentary India’s Daughter about the brutal rape and murder of Jyoti Singh, a young medical student on her way from the movies with a friend who was tricked onto a bus and gang raped has been gaining controversial steam over the past twenty-four hours after India’s government moved to ban the film from being shown on TV in their country. The BBC complied and removed the film from their programming but that hasn’t stopped many Youtubers from posting the film online. The Twittersphere has been blowing up with people either praising the decision to censor the film or vehemently arguing against it. Regardless, if India’s intentions were to censor and downplay the controversy, their approach has certainly backfired.

Having watched it myself today on one of these bootlegged Youtube accounts (I’ll post the link below), I can say that it is one of the most disturbing films I have watched in recent history. The documentary, though not particularly artful, managed to paint a horrific picture of the events of that terrible night when Jyoti Singh was fatally raped in Delhi and even more vividly portray a shocking attitude towards women on the part of the attackers who showed no remorse and took no responsibility for their actions.

One of the more controversial parts of the documentary is the decision to give voice to Mukesh Singh, one of the attackers and the driver of the bus that Jyoti was lured into. He goes on to say truly shocking and vile things such as no decent girl would be roaming around the streets at 9 pm and that the girl is more responsible for rape than the boy without even an ounce of regret or empathy on his face. I understand the concern that by interviewing this man, we are giving him a platform to further his views but I think the interview does quite the opposite. It’s repulsive, it’s shocking and clearly serves to show how monstrous these acts and these attitudes really are. We need to no longer stay blind to the kind of attitudes towards women that exist in India and around the world, we need to face it head on and we need to deal with it. It’s not a platform for hate speech but rather a wake up call for change.

At the beginning of the film, Joyti’s mother explains that her name means “light”. If there is any light that comes from this story it’s Joyti’s life and her determination to educate herself and change the mentality of the world she lived in. There is one part of the film that is unarguably worth watching, it’s the telling of her story. In the final scene of the film when Jyoti’s funeral pyre is burning and we see what is literally her light going out, I was struck with a thought; we can keep that light burning by fighting for changes in society and her death need not be in vain.

Opinion, Review

Stop At Nothing: The Lance Armstrong Story Review (Netflix)


My Rating: 4/5

Lance Armstrong is sitting in the conference room of his lawyer’s office under deposition aggressively, unapologetically denying any use of performance enhancing drugs during his career. And so starts the film about an arrogant bully who would do anything to get what he wants including deceiving the public and destroying anyone who gets in his way. This film does a brilliant job taking the viewer into the secret world of back rooms and team trailers where some of the world’s top cyclists were shooting up steroids and EPO’s while reaping the benefits of million dollar sponsorship deals.

This film highlights the media’s role in buying into the Lance Armstrong “hero” story. How his struggles with overcoming cancer and his incredible against all odds comeback made him untouchable. The media routinely ignored clues that something more sinister may be going on and continued to present Lance Armstrong as the ultimate sports champion. Those who dared to question him publicly were shunned and personally targeted by Lance.

Director Alex Holmes starts with Lance’s meager beginnings in Texans with dreams of making it big. He paints Lance as an incredibly ambitious man who saw the cycling world as a way to make huge fortunes. When the opportunity presented itself, Lance seemed to think it was a no-brainer that he would enlist the help of one of the most notorious suspected doping doctors in the cycling world; Dr. Ferrari (Yes, that is his real name). His rising momentum came to halt when he received a startling testicular cancer diagnosis. It was in an Indiana State Hospital room that Betsy Andreu and her husband overheard Lance admit to a group of consulting doctors that he had taken a variety of performance enhancing substances.

Lance made a recovery and soon returned to the sport of cycling. And when he returned, it was with a vengeance. It’s here during the seven Tour de France wins that the film gets juicy describing scenes almost too salacious to believe of midnight steroid pickups in a McDonald’s parking lot and last minute blood transfusions in hotel rooms all during the most watched and speculated event in cycling. Regardless of the rightness of his actions, the man sure was bold.

After his wins, Lance Armstrong had practically achieved God status in American sports and his brand was as big as ever. As meteoric as his rise was, so was his fall. A disgruntled former member of his cycling bitter from his firing came out and publicly attested to participating in doping and watching Lance Armstrong do the same. Armstrong was enraged and did everything in his power to fight the truth. A federal investigation was remarkably dropped against Armstrong despite first-hand witnesses to his fraud. But after a follow-up investigation was conducted by the U.S. anti-doping agency, he could no longer lie to the public. Cue Oprah and her now iconic interview in which, within the first several minutes, Lance Armstrong admitted to everything he had fought so hard to hide.

I found this documentary to be incredibly enraging and a fascinating study in what happens when we want so hard to believe in a miraculous comeback story that we are willing to ignore the flaws of our hero. There were many journalists who had sounded the alarm about the deceit but that was a narrative the mainstream media did not want to know. The more I watched, the more I was shocked at how cocky and frankly scary Lance Armstrong behaviors were. As disturbing was this story was there was one hero that emerged from it all: Betsey Andreu, the wife of a former Postal Service team member who for a decade dared to expose Lance’s conduct. While everyone else that knew of the fraud was scared into silence, Betsy Andreu remarkably stood strong and was never willing to back down. As Betsey says in the documentary, “what Lance never hard was the truth.” If there is one clear conclusion to be drawn from this, it’s that Lance Armstrong no doubt was a talented athlete but an even more talented liar.